🔗 Share this article

The latest departures of the BBC's director general and its head of news over claims of partiality have been portrayed as an internal "coup" by a former media executive.

David Yelland, who previously ran the Sun newspaper from 1998 to 2003, claimed during a radio program that the departures of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness followed methodical weakening by individuals close to the BBC board over an prolonged period.

"It constituted a coup, and more serious than that, it was an internal operation. There were individuals within the organization, extremely connected to the leadership ... serving on the board, who have systematically undermined Tim Davie and his executive staff over a duration of [time] and this has been continuing for a long time. What transpired yesterday wasn't merely in vacuum," the former editor commented.

Governance Breakdown Highlighted

"What has transpired here is there existed a breakdown of governance. I don't hold responsible the leader [Samir Shah] as an individual, but the responsibility of the leader of any organization, a company – including the BBC – is to keep their chief executive, their senior leader, in role or terminate them. And that has not occurred, because Tim Davie hadn't been dismissed. He stepped down and so there existed, that is the essence of, a breakdown of leadership."

Background of Recent Dispute

The resignations on Sunday followed period of criticism from the White House and rightwing pundits in the UK that were prompted by claims published by the Daily Telegraph.

The publication disclosed a unauthorized record of the conclusions of a previous independent external adviser to its content standards panel, Michael Prescott, who departed his position during the warmer months.

He had questioned the editing of a address by Donald Trump in an episode of Panorama, which he asserted made it appear that Trump had supported the US Capitol attack. Two sections of the address that were combined together were delivered an hour apart, and the modification did not note that Trump had also stated he wanted his supporters to demonstrate non-violently.

Internal Responses and Outside Perspectives

Yelland's comments echo a sentiment of concern reported by insiders within BBC News on Sunday night, with one stating: "It feels like a coup. This is the result of a campaign by partisan opponents of the BBC."

Different voices, encompassing Sky's former political editor Adam Boulton, have stated the overall perception that Trump egged on the event was essentially accurate. It is common procedure to edit together segments of a long address to properly summarize it.

Transition Arrangements and Institutional Impact

Davie stated his departure would wouldn't be instant and that he was "working through" timings to ensure an "orderly transition" over the coming period. Turness commented controversy around the Panorama edit had "arrived at a stage where it is causing harm to the BBC – an institution that I love."

On Monday, the BBC journalist Nick Robinson revealed there had been inaction at the highest levels of the BBC because, while its experienced journalists wanted to apologize for the editing error – but maintain there was "no plan to mislead" the viewers – the government-selected leaders wanted to take additional steps.

Political Response and Wider Context

Shah is expected to express regret on Monday to the Commons' cultural affairs panel, and to provide further details on the Panorama program in his response to the panel, which had asked how he would handle the issues.

Speaking after the departures, the cabinet official Louise Sandher-Jones rejected claims the BBC was institutionally partial. The public service official told Sky News: "When you examine the vast range of national issues, local concerns, global issues, that it has to cover, I believe its content is very respected. When I converse with individuals who've got firmly established opinions on those, they're still using the BBC for much of their information, it's shaping their perspectives on this."