🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by more than half, following a controversial law change that required local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently spent years generating community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish different wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.