🔗 Share this article

One of the most famous images of the 20th century depicts a nude child, her hands outstretched, her features distorted in agony, her skin blistered and raw. She appears dashing in the direction of the lens while escaping a bombing within the Vietnam War. To her side, additional kids also run from the devastated village in the area, against a scene of black clouds and military personnel.

This International Effect of an Powerful Image

Within hours the publication in the early 1970s, this image—formally called "The Terror of War"—evolved into an analog sensation. Seen and discussed globally, it has been generally hailed for galvanizing global sentiment critical of the American involvement in Southeast Asia. An influential thinker later commented how this deeply indelible image of nine-year-old Kim Phúc suffering likely had a greater impact to heighten popular disgust toward the conflict than lengthy broadcasts of shown violence. A renowned British photojournalist who covered the war called it the most powerful image from what became known as the televised conflict. A different seasoned war journalist declared that the image stands as quite simply, one of the most important photographs ever taken, especially from that conflict.

A Long-Standing Claim and a Modern Claim

For half a century, the photo was assigned to a South Vietnamese photographer, an emerging local photojournalist working for an international outlet at the time. However a controversial recent documentary on a global network contends which states the well-known photograph—often hailed as the apex of war journalism—may have been taken by another person on the scene in Trảng Bàng.

As claimed by the film, The Terror of War was in fact taken by a stringer, who sold his work to the AP. The allegation, and the film’s resulting investigation, originates with a man named a former photo editor, who alleges that the powerful bureau head directed him to change the image’s credit from the freelancer to Nick Út, the only employed photographer on site at the time.

The Investigation to find the Real Story

The former editor, now in his 80s, emailed a filmmaker in 2022, seeking support to locate the unnamed stringer. He expressed that, should he still be alive, he wanted to give an acknowledgment. The investigator considered the independent stringers he worked with—seeing them as the stringers of today, similar to Vietnamese freelancers in that era, are often marginalized. Their efforts is commonly challenged, and they work in far tougher situations. They are not insured, they don’t have pensions, little backing, they often don’t have good equipment, and they are highly exposed when documenting within their homeland.

The journalist pondered: “What must it feel like to be the individual who made this image, if indeed Nick Út didn’t take it?” As an image-maker, he imagined, it would be profoundly difficult. As a student of photojournalism, especially the highly regarded documentation of the era, it could prove earth-shattering, maybe reputation-threatening. The respected history of the photograph among the diaspora was so strong that the director with a background fled in that period was hesitant to take on the investigation. He expressed, I was unwilling to challenge the accepted account that Nick had taken the picture. Nor did I wish to disturb the current understanding among a group that consistently looked up to this achievement.”

The Inquiry Unfolds

Yet the two the journalist and his collaborator concluded: it was important asking the question. As members of the press must hold everybody else in the world,” remarked the investigator, it is essential that we can pose challenging queries of ourselves.”

The film follows the investigators as they pursue their research, from eyewitness interviews, to call-outs in modern Saigon, to archival research from additional films taken that day. Their search eventually yield a name: a driver, working for a television outlet at the time who also provided images to the press independently. In the film, a moved the man, like others in his 80s based in the United States, claims that he provided the photograph to the news organization for a small fee and a print, but was plagued without recognition for decades.

This Reaction Followed by Additional Analysis

The man comes across throughout the documentary, thoughtful and reflective, however, his claim proved incendiary in the field of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to