🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes added later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year backed Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does because then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.